Pages Navigation Menu

Can China become an innovation hub

Can China become an innovation hub

In the recent EastAsiaForum article by Seamus Grimes, NUI Galway that was entitled “Can China become an innovation hub?” the author takes a leap into the innovation advancements in China. What are the things that impact China’s innovation?

The business world is more on competition than collaboration. The West is suspicious about China’s long term political goals. Due to this, it hinders the collaboration needed by business sector.

While these issues increase questions about the shifting characteristics of the partnership between traditional organizations and the state in this progressively more international era, there are other things that encourage China’s goal to become an innovation powerhouse.

As Western organizations progressively try to become international, they often use the practical unsupported claims of becoming a ‘Chinese company’ when searching to grow deep in the China. US multinationals managing in Chinese industry often only become ‘US companies’ when they feel the need to use the lobbying power of their own administration to search for better business circumstances within the Chinese industry.

Innovation is not simply about raising R&D financial commitment, but also about switching the learning atmosphere to nurture ingenuity, styles and significant thinking in training. This is quite a task within China’s government, which is to develop a ‘harmonious society’.

With its recent Indigenous Innovation Policy, China reduced foreign organizations from carrying on control technology groups, and is giving local organizations every advantage to take them on. So, with regards to innovation, China is preoccupied in advertising “indigenous innovation”. This will decrease the dependency on overseas technology.

An increase in extremely profitable Chinese organizations like Huawei, Haier and Lenovo also gives importance in China’s costs in innovation. In the last 30 years, foreign multinationals have built up significant success by certifying their technology to their subsidiaries in China. Chinese organizations have won in taking on the multinationals, not only in China but also around the globe.

Innovation in foreign international situation is attached with the popularity within major organizations. It spent in a great extent to guarantee high-quality products. To be aggressive, these major organizations have become globalized by outsourcing workers. They have also developed it not just within China but also countries like India. Despite the current financial downturn, China is still displaying a higher level of financial development.

The primary regulations of capitalism do not change, but the considerable move of business activities toward the East has gotten about a very significant switch in the hub of severity of business enterprises.

China’s amazing efficiency during the current economic downturn also indicates that it has joined a new level in its progression. Therefore, there are some reasons for questioning whether China’s particular brand of capitalism within a structure of powerful state mediation may have the potential to bring about significant changes in the continuous major part of significant foreign organizations in the international economic climate.

The unrivaled power which China offers in its dealing with foreign firms is simply based on its size, pace of development and powerful industry. However, to what level it is capable of using these abilities to upend foreign hegemony of technology is a truly exciting question.

China’s push to become a major international creativity hub is strongly based in its fast pace of development in R&D investment, but innovation must result in industry popularity if is to have a really tough impact. To date, a few China ‘national champion’ companies have shown a capacity to control certain subsectors while some previously major foreign technological organizations are beginning to slow.

Although China has still a long way to go to compare with Western technology, it still managed to be aggressive when it comes to its competitors.

Note: The preceding is a summary of an article found though our research, and is provided here with editorial comment for members only. Please see the full article at the following link for full original content:

The New Asia Innovation Team